Haley v. Van Lierop
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
RAYMOND, District Judge.
Findings of Fact.
1. Plaintiff is a resident of Sarasota, Florida; defendant is a resident of Hartford, Michigan; and the amount involved is in excess of $3000, exclusive of interest and costs.
2. Roth of the parties are now and for several years past have been engaged in the business of growing and marketing gladiolus bulbs.
3. Plaintiff seeks to recover $38,235 for damages resulting from alleged lost profits because of the failure of defendant to deliver 525,000 gladiolus bulbs of a total of 1,300,000, orders for which (Exhibits 1 and 2) were accepted by defendant on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. Peninsular Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- Snipes Mountain Co. v. Benz Bros. & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- Boehme & Rauch Co. v. LorimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922