Legal Opinion

Carr v. Adult & Family Services Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 8, 1984No. 5-1401-MYE593-8; CA A27560PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Petitioner appeals an order of the Adult and Family Services Division (AFSD) upholding the termination of her General Assistance (GA) benefits. The hearings officer concluded that petitioner had failed to document a condition of unemployability and was for that reason ineligible for further GA benefits.1 Because the order fails to demonstrate a rational nexus between its findings of fact and conclusion of law, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Before the commencement of these proceedings petitioner had received GA benefits, because psychiatric problems had rendered her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Home Plate, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, Local No. 1489Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. McCann v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Amundson v. Adult & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Benson v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. Tompkins v. Forest Grove School District 15Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Moki, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Tompkins v. Forest Grove School District 15Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API