Legal Opinion

Amundson v. Adult & Family Services

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 25, 1983No. 2-2202-KLB353-3; CA A23625PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Petitioners seek review of a final order of the Adult & Family Services Division (AFSD) sustaining a branch office’s denial of their application for benefits under the state Aid to Dependant Children (ADC) program. We reverse and remand, because the agency impermissibly delegated its decision making responsibility to a group of agency employes and consultants known as the Medical Review Team (MRT).

On September 16,1981, petitioners Billy and Donna Amundson filed a claim for ADC assistance, because Donna (Mrs. Amundson) had been “incapacitated” by surgery for a ruptured ectopic pregnancy.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rolfe v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Matthew v. JurasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kuykendall v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. Carr v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Benson v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API