Campbell v. Williamson
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:
Campbell, a state prisoner, has submitted a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
He claims that the Defendants — various law enforcement and correctional officials — violated his constitutional rights by denying him due process.
Plaintiff’s petition for leave to proceed without prepayment of costs and fees is denied and the complaint is dismissed.
STANDARD
It is well established that pro se complaints are to be liberally construed. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972), reh’g denied, 405 U.S. 948, 92 S.Ct. 963, 30 L.Ed.2d 819 (1972).…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Murphy v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gonzalez-Fuentes v. MolinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Jenkins v. CurrierCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Vincent Henderson Daryelle Rexrode John Calella v. Stuart O. Simms Richard Lanham, Sr. William O. FilbertCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Hurd v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Aurecchione v. FalcoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.