Legal Opinion
Hurd v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 19, 2015No. Civil Action No. 15-666 (ESH)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge
Plaintiff brings this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to redress alleged due procéss violations by the District of Columbia (“the District”). He claims the District suddenly and unjustly re-incarcerated him without a hearing, four years after he was mistakenly released from a federal prison. (Am. Compl., July 10, 2015 [ECF No. 7].) The District has moved to dismiss, arguing that plaintiffs substantive due process claim is barred by the doctrine of res judicata and that the District did not violate plaintiffs substantive or…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hurd v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Hurd v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Hurd v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Hurd, Jr. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Michael Hurd, Jr. v. DCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021