Legal Opinion
Mtr. of City of Ny (5th Ave. Coach Lines)
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 7, 1966PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*217Burke, J.
The only issue presented on this appeal which calls for a modification is the reliance of the courts below on eiToneoqs principles of law regarding the evslqatioq of the *218condemnees’ intangible property. The theory relied upon is unrealistic, resulting- in the denial of the just compensation to which claimants are entitled under the Constitution. The present award is sufficient only as compensation for the value of the tangible property taken.
The problems raised in this condemnation proceeding are difficult and to a degree unique. In this era of spiraling inflation such proceedings…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- New Haven Inclusion CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Oakland v. Oakland RaidersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp. v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.