Legal Opinion

Lindsteadt v. Louis Sands Salt & Lumber Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1916No. Docket No. 1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Certiorari to the Industrial Accident Board. Mary Lindsteadt* presented a claim for compensation against the Louis Sands Salt & Lumber Company for the death of her husband in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation respondent brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

In this proceeding defendant reviews the determination of the Industrial Accident Board, by the terms of which it is compelled to pay to the applicant the sum of $6.17 per week for a period of 300 weeks, as compensation for the death of one William Lindsteadt, husband of the applicant. The findings of fact and law made by the Industrial Accident Board follow:

“(1) That the defendant, the Louis Sands Salt & Lumber Company, is a corporation with its principal offices and place of business in the city of Manistee, Mich., and is and has been for a number of years engaged in the manufacture of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rayner v. Sligh Furniture Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. McCoy v. Michigan Screw Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Bayne v. Riverside Storage & Cartage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Aquilina v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Mailman's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
  3. Bell v. Hayes-Ionia Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Vogeley v. Detroit Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Annereau v. Ewauna Box Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API