Legal Opinion

Sayles v. Foley, Blomquist

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 26, 1916PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Petitions for relief in accordance with the provisions of Pub. Laws, cap. 831. Certified on constitutional questions.

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

These two cases are petitions by Frank A. Sayles as lessee and operator of the Glenlyon Dye Works, in the town of Lincoln, in this State, filed in the Superior Court for Providence County, October 16, 1913. The petitioner as employer asks for relief against the two respondents as employees in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 831 of the Public Laws, entitled “An Act relative to Payments to Employees for Personal Injuries received in the course of their employment, and to the Prevention of such Injuries,” commonly known as the “Workmen’s Compensation Act. ”

The petitions allege, inter…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Miller v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Ives v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Jeffrey Manufacturing Co. v. BlaggSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Benson v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In Re Wm. Akers, Jr., Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  3. Wells v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  4. Fallon v. Skin Medicine & Surgery Centers of Rhode Island, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  5. Piccirillo v. Avenir, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API