Legal Opinion

Piccirillo v. Avenir, Inc.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 17, 1986No. 84-18-AppealPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KELLEHER, Justice.

The worker in this Workers’ Compensation dispute faults the Workers’ Compensation Commission for an appellate commission’s affirmance of a trial commissioner’s denial of the worker’s petition for benefits allegedly due him pursuant to the pertinent provisions of Rhode Island’s Compensation Act. Hereafter we shall refer to the worker as Piccirillo and to the corporate employer as Avenir.

The record in this controversy reminds us that prior to the enactment of workers’ compensation legislation by the General Assembly at its January 1912 session, any worker who sought…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sayles v. Foley, BlomquistSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1916
  2. Baumler v. Narragansett Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1901
  3. Laporte v. CookSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1899
  4. Burnham v. New York, Providence & Boston RailroadSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lopes v. G.T.E. Products Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API