Legal Opinion · Dissent
McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 18, 1943No. 9957Published
1DissentMathews, Circuit Judge
*485Appellees, Kammerer Corporation and Baash-Ross Tool Company, brought two suits against Otis J. McCullough, Ray Andrade and appellant, Ira J. McCullough, for infringement of claims 1-9, 12, 14-18 and 21 of patent No. 1,625,391,1 of which Kammerer Corporation was the owner and Baash-Ross Tool Company was, in the United States, sole licensee. Defenses were that the claims were invalid, and that, if valid, they were not'infringed. The suits were consolidated and tried by the court. The court held the claims valid and infringed by appellant. If accordingly entered judgments which dismissed the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Toledo Pressed Steel Co. v. Standard Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Textile MacHine Works v. Louis Hirsch Textile MacHines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mantle Lamp Co. v. Aluminum Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Grayson Heat Control v. Los Angeles Gas Appliance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.