Legal Opinion

Kennewick Irrigation District v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 12, 1989No. Nos. 87-4203, 87-4204 and 88-3800PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

The United States appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs Kennewick Irrigation District (Kennewick), the National Railway Passenger Corporation (National Railway) and Burlington Northern, Inc. (Burlington Northern). Plaintiffs brought separate suits under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b), to recover for property damage and personal injuries arising out of two breaks in Kenne-wick’s main irrigation canal. The canal was designed and constructed in the mid-1950s by the United States Bureau of Reclamation (Bureau). On appeal, the government…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Daigle v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. Kendra Summers, a Minor, and Frederick J. Summers, Guardian Ad Litem v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Everett Todd Faber v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Ronald D. Routh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Richmond v. HaneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API