Legal Opinion

Utter v. Marsh Sales Company

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1963No. 7166PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

The claimant appeals from a judgment denying workmen’s compensation benefits for the loss by amputation of certain toes and fingers as the result of frostbite.

The cause was heard on the merits. The trial court found that the injury complained of did not arise out of or in the course of the employment and was not reasonably incident thereto; that claimant by reason of his employment was not subjected to a greater risk or hazard than that to which the general public was exposed. The court then concluded that the claimant was not entitled to compensation. Accordingly,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Bounds v. CarnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Luna v. FloresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Viramontes v. FoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Goldenberg v. LawNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Frederick v. Younger Van LinesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. GibbyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Geeslin v. Goodno, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Ensley Ex Rel. Ensley v. GraceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API