Legal Opinion

Hickman v. Leary

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, because of the error of the trial court in submitting to the jury on the theory of quantum meruit the claims which were admittedly covered by an express contract. It was agreed between the parties that the plaintiff was to build the Orlo III at cost for not more than $6,000, and repair the Orlo II upon the express terms of cost plus stipulated percentages fixed in the written memorandum. Under these conditions the plaintiff could not recover the reasonable value of the work, labor and…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. La Rose v. BackerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API