Hinkle v. Fisher
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Randolph Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, C. J.
Action by Jacob Fisher against Squire J. Hinkle for damages alleged to have resulted from the nonperformance of -a parol contract. A demurrer having been first overruled, a jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, assessing his damages at $65, and judgment followed upon the verdict.
The only question presented upon this appeal is, did the circuit court err in overruling the demurrer to the complaint?
The complaint charged that in March, 1882, the board of commissioners of the county of Randolph, in this State, upon the petition of the defendant Hinkle and others, made and entered of record an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wolke v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Wiggins v. KeizerIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- Hunt v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Haugh v. Blythe's ExecutorsIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Baynes v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Grand Forks Lumber Co. v. McClure Logging Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Tincher v. Greencastle Federal Savings BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Coffin v. BradburyIdaho Supreme Court · 1894
- American Quarries Co. v. LayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Timmonds v. TaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.