Baker v. Lafayette College
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
SPAETH, President Judge,
dissenting:
This appeal is from two orders. I believe that both orders should be reversed.
In its first order the trial court sustained the College’s preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer, holding that insofar as the Gluhman evaluations were concerned, appellant had stated no claim against the College for defamation because the evaluations were absolutely privileged. The standard by which we must review a trial court’s action sustaining a demurrer is as follows:
All material facts set forth in the complaint as well as all inferences reasonably deducible…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.