Legal Opinion

Payne v. McKinley

California Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1880No. 6,027PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from an order dissolving an injunction, in the Fourth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Mobbison, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Department No. 1, Ross, J.:

Plaintiffs, who are private persons, are the owners and in possession of a certain block of land fronting on Berry Street, in the City and County of San Francisco, and bring this action to enjoin defendants from constructing a street railroad in and upon said street. The only averment of injury to plaintiffs found in the complaint is the following: “ That the use and occupation of said street by defendants for the purpose of constructing and operating said railroad, as aforesaid, would cause great and irreparable injury to plaintiffs and their property, by reason of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bigley v. NunanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brown v. Florida Chautauqua Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  2. Marini v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Brown v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Bowen v. WendtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Flood v. Consumers Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API