Legal Opinion

Pishevar v. Fusion Gps

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 21, 2025No. Misc. No. 2021-0105Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHERVIN PISHEVAR, Petitioner, v. Case No. 21-mc-105-ABJ-MJS FUSION GPS, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Through this miscellaneous case, Petitioner Shervin Pishevar (“Pishevar”) is in pursuit of discovery from Bean LLC d/b/a Fusion GPS (“Fusion GPS”) that Pishevar says he plans to use in legal proceedings in the United Kingdom. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782, former Magistrate Judge Meriweather previously granted Pishevar’s ex parte application to issue two subpoenas to Fusion GPS, one seeking documents and another seeking deposition…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Watts v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  3. AF Holdings, LLC v. Does 1-1058Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  4. Mason Tenders District Council of Greater New York v. Phase Construction Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  5. In Re VeigaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API