Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Golden

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1937No. Docket No. 76, Calendar No. 39,373PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bushnell, J;

Plaintiff’s action for damages, because of the claimed negligent operation by defendant of his car in which she was riding, resulted in the jury’s verdict in her favor of $895. Decision on defendant ’s motion for a directed verdict having been reserved, the court denied the same, together with a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto, and defendant appeals.

Prior to the accident out of which this action arose, plaintiff Julia C. Hopkins, her husband, Thomas T. Hopkins and Fanny Boots, a lodger in their home, wanted to go to the smelt run at Beulah, Michigan. The Hopkins car was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Keiswetter v. RubensteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Fletcher v. FletcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Farthing v. HepinstallMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Frisorger v. ShepseMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Laughlin v. Michigan Motor Freight LinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bostrom v. JenningsMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Sherman v. KorffMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Steudle v. Yellow & Checker Cab & Transfer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Boyd v. McKeeverMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Jorgensen v. HowlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API