Legal Opinion

United States v. Mills

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 6, 2019No. Case No. 16-cr-20460Published

1Opinion of the Court

Finally, Wilson makes the following two requests in his objections: (i) permit defense counsel to be present in the room during the Government's expert's interviewing and/or testing of Wilson, and (ii) authorize the video recording of any testing performed. The Court will address and deny each request in turn.

1. Right to Counsel During the Government's Neuropsychological Testing

Regarding his first request, Wilson acknowledges that his Atkins claim has resulted *572in a limited waiver of his Fifth Amendment rights, but only with respect to matters relevant to his supposed intellectual disability.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Buchanan v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Powell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. Earl S. BairdCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API