Legal Opinion
Benejan v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 3, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered March 27, 2002, which granted the motion of petitioner, self-designated as plaintiff, for leave to serve and file a late notice of claim nunc pro tunc, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.
The notice of claim which petitioner sought leave to serve and file arises from a September 2000 automobile accident with a bus which allegedly resulted in serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Petitioner failed to file a statutorily mandated notice of claim within 90 days of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burgos v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Rybka v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Gomez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Potts v. City of New York Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shister v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Alvarez v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Alvarez v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Kane v. LeistmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008