Legal Opinion

Kane v. Leistman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 13, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e for leave to serve a late notice of claim, Richard Leistman and the New York City Transit Authority appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (McMahon, J.), dated October 27, 2006, as granted that branch of the petition which was to file a summons and complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in permitting the petitioners to file the summons and complaint attached to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Giblin v. Nassau County Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Cruz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Benejan v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Shister v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API