Legal Opinion

Cornforth v. University of Oklahoma Board of Regents

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 16, 2001No. 00-6119PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

After plaintiff-appellee, Retta Cornforth, was terminated from her position as a medical staff secretary at the University of Oklahoma, she sued both the Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma (the “University”) and her supervisor, Bill Barringer, alleging, inter alia, violations of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (“FMLA”). Barringer filed a motion to dismiss the FMLA claims and the motion was denied by the district court. Barring-er then brought this appeal.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Good v. United States Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  2. Norton v. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  3. Cordova v. New MexicoDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
  4. Gray v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Kansas Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API