Legal Opinion
Battle v. Kessler
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 13, 1983No. Civ. 69759PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FEINERMAN, P. J.
Will C. and Edgar Battle (plaintiffs) purport to appeal from an order sustaining the demurrer of Max Kessler, Marilyn Kessler and George Kessler (defendants) to plaintiffs’ first amended complaint without leave to amend. An order sustaining a demurrer is not appealable. (Dollar-A-Day Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. v. Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. (1972) 26 Cal.App.3d 454, 456, fn. 1 [102 Cal.Rptr. 651]; Beazell v. Schrader (1962) 205 Cal.App.2d 673, 674 [23 Cal.Rptr. 189].) However, in this case an order of dismissal was entered based on the order sustaining the demurrer.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El SegundoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Balen v. Peralta Junior College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Douglas Aircraft Co. v. CranstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- White v. Western Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- 20th Century Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- United States Cold Storage v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Nelson v. Flintkote Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Moore v. State Board of ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.