Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Dist. of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 16, 2018No. Civil Action No.: 15–0444 (RC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
DENYING DEFENDANT'S RULE 54(b) MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [31]
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Mark Robinson, a Sergeant with the Metropolitan Police Department ("MPD") worked in the Automated Traffic Enforcement Unit ("ATEU") full-time starting in 2008. In December 2011, Mr. Robinson was transferred out of the ATEU as part of a civilianization of the Unit. Although MPD asserts that no sworn officers worked in the ATEU full-time after 2011, the Overtime Program continued, meaning hundreds of officers were able to work there outside of their normal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Singh v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Bell v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- United States Ex Rel. Westrick v. Second Chance Body Armor, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Lewis v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beach Tv Properties Inc. v. SolomanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Cook Inlet Tribal Council, Inc. v. MandreganDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Lodge Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- McWatters v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and ExplosivesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- University of Colorado Health at Memorial Hospital v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021