Legal Opinion

Layton v. Rowland

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.

As to the demurrer to the first cause of action, the case is ruled by Mesar v. Southern Surety Co., post, p. 578, 222 N. W. 809, decided herewith, and the order of the trial court must be affirmed.

The second cause of action involves a single question of law, which is decisive of the issue, and that is, whether an action for. death by wrongful act, under sec. 331.01, Stats., survives the death of the wrongdoer.

It was admitted on the argument, as the fact is, that Kranz v. Wis. Trust Co. 155 Wis. 40, 143 N. W. 1049, holding that the action does not survive, rules this case, and in order to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mellon v. GoodyearSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Putnam v. SavageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Devine v. HealyIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Kranz v. Wisconsin Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Mesar v. Southern Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wiechmann v. HuberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Lornson v. SiddiquiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Bischoff v. City of AppletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Hegel v. GeorgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Lornson v. SiddiquiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API