Freaner v. Valle
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND, (3) SETTING DEADLINE FOR COMPLETION OF PENDING ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS
JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Ariel Freaner’s (“Plaintiff,” or “Freaner”) Motion to Compel Arbitration of the 2009 Contract, (Mot. Compel Arbit., ECF No. 82), as well as Defendants Enrique Martin Lutteroth Valle (“Valle”) and Hotelera Coral, S.A. de C.V.’s (“Hotelera Coral,” and collectively, “Defendants”) response in opposition, (Resp. in Opp’n, ECF…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Morgan Stanley & Co. v. CouchDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Ensambles Hyson, S.A de C.V. v. SanchezDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
- Halcyon Syndicate Ltd., LLC v. Graham Beck Enterprises (PTY), Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Northrop Grumman v. Mnstry of DefCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Tix Corp. v. Live It Live, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015