Legal Opinion

In Re the Arbitration Between Utility Laundry Service, Inc. & Sklar

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1949PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBromley, J.

The Appellate Division has reversed appellant’s judgment for damages, rendered in confirmation of an arbitra tian award, upon the ground that the parties’ agreement to arbitrate did not afford the arbitrator power to assess damages.

Prior to November, 1945, respondents, Sklar and Shampaner, were employed by Utility Laundry Service, Inc., as salesmen and drivers. Each of their individual employment contracts contained a covenant binding the employee, during one year after termination of his employment, to refrain from soliciting any customer of the employer whose name had been learned through…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Matter of General Footwear v. A.C. Lawrence LeatherNew York Court of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Refinery Employees Union of Lake Charles Area v. Continental Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. Maxwell Shapiro Woolen Co. Inc. v. Amerotron Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. City of Miami v. Fraternal Order of PoliceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Sheets v. SheetsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  5. In re the Arbitration between Publishers' Ass'n & New York Stereotypers' Union Number OneNew York Court of Appeals · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API