Legal Opinion

Wulf v. Astrue

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 26, 2011No. Case 09-1348-SACPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAM A. CROW, Senior District Judge.

This is an action reviewing the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying the plaintiff disability insurance benefits. The matter has been fully briefed by the parties.

I. General legal standards

The court’s standard of review is set forth in 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), which provides that “the findings of the Commissioner as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive.” The court should review the Commissioner’s decision to determine only whether the decision was supported by substantial evidence and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Linda S. Thompson v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  3. Hamlin v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  4. Rhonda Kay RAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. Rita Robinson v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API