Marosis v. Nira

I do not concur in the majority opinion, nor in the disposition made of this case.

As pointed out in the original opinion, by issue No. 22, the question as to the amount of recovery based on physician’s services, hospital bills, etc., was properly submitted to the jury, and answered in dollars and cents to be $600. This finding by the jury is not even challenged by appellant, but the effect of the majority holding is that this finding must be set aside because issue No. 23, inquiring about the amount of damages due to personal injuries, was defective, in that it did not properly place the…