Legal Opinion

The Sitka

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided October 22, 1904No. Nos. 139, 140, 142PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Admiralty. Suits for collision.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

Two collisions in St. Mary’s river, the first between the lake steamers Eliza H. Strong and Sitka, the other between the Sitka and the barge Commodore, in tow of the first-mentioned steamer, are the bases for the above-entitled actions. Libels were filed against the Sitka by the Strong Transportation Company, owner of the Eliza H. Strong, and by Kund Pederson et al., owners of the barge Commodore. The claimants of the Sitka brought the Strong into the proceeding in the latter action, and also filed an original libel in rem against both the Strong and the Commodore. By…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. The AriadneSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. The OttawaSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. Chamberlain v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  5. The Elizabeth JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The SitkaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1907
  2. The Henry W. CardDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API