Legal Opinion

People v. Dyer

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1939No. Crim. 2000PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, J., pro tem.

At the close of the trial in which appellant, although represented by the public defender, had actively examined witnesses, the jury found him guilty of robbery in the first degree, as charged in the indictment. Upon arraignment he had admitted a prior conviction of robbery. His motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment haxdng been denied, he xvas sentenced to imprisonment in the state penitentiary. He appeals in propria persona.

Appellant does not dispute the sufficiency of the evidence to establish the commission of the crime by two unmasked men but he does question…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. FolletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. People v. MolinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. People v. LavenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. People v. CottonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. People v. DickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. SlobodionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State v. DunnIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. People v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API