Legal Opinion
Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz (In Re Ritz)
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 10, 2016No. 14-20526PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
KING, Circuit Judge:
Daniel Ritz, in financial control of Chrysalis Manufacturing Corp., caused funds to be transferred from Chrysalis which effectively rendered Chrysalis unable to pay a debt owed to Husky International Electronics, Incorporated. When Ritz filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, Husky initiated an adversary proceeding objecting to Ritz’s discharge under, inter alia, 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A). The bankruptcy court rejected this challenge, holding that Ritz owed no debt to Husky under Texas law. The district court affirmed the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Castleberry v. BranscumTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. RitzSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- RecoverEdge L.P. v. PentecostCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- SSP Partners v. Gladstrong Investments (USA) Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Humberto Saenz, Jr. v. Jose GomezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Kevin Harris v. James F. JayoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Carl Selenberg v. Dianne BatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz (In re Ritz)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
- Thomas v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.