Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. State ex rel. Baldwin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1888No. 9824PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Bartholomew Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, C. J.

In this case the State of Indiana, on the relation of its attorney general, for the use of its common school fund, presented to the board of commissioners of Bartholomew county, for allowance and payment, a claim in two paragraphs. This claim was disallowed and rejected by the county board, and the State appealed from such action to the circuit court of the county. There the county board, as de*330feiulant, answered in live paragraphs, of which the first was a general denial of the State’s claim or complaint herein, and each of the other paragraphs stated a special defence. 'Flic State’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Quick v. White-Water TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  2. State v. Springfield TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Moore v. State ex rel. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Davis v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Quick v. Springfield TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1856

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Smith v. McClellandIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Jeana M. Horner v. Terry R. CurryIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. StuartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Board of Commissioners v. State ex rel. MichenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Board of Commissioners v. State ex rel. MichenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API