Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. Holland

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1914PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Guernsey county.

1Opinion of the Court

Pollock, J.; Metcalf-and Norris, JJ., con- ' curring.

The defendants in error, James and Susan Holland, brought an action in the court of common pleas of this county in which they alleged that on or about the .... day of October, 1908, the plaintiffs in error wrongfully converted to their own use certain articles of household furniture owned by the defendants in error.

The answer of the defendants below contained two defenses, but it is now only necessary to refer to the second defense, which was a plea of the statute of limitations, alleging that the cause of action did not accrue within four…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Omaha & Grant Smelting & Refining Co. v. TaborSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  2. Bristol v. BurtNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  3. Trustees of the University of North Carolina v. State National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. Thorp v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1895

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Michelle Moody v. Atlantic City Board of EducatiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. Mantena v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. Fulks v. FulksOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Danopulos v. American Trading II, LLCOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API