Legal Opinion
(PS) Conerly v. Superior Court of California County of Sacramento
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 4, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00362Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CARINA CONERLY, No. 2:20-cv-0362-KJM-KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. (ECF No. 6) 14 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On February 18, Plaintiff filed a Complaint, paid the filing fee, and also filed a motion to 18 proceed in forma pauperis (IFP).1 (ECF Nos. 1, 2). On February 21, Plaintiff filed a motion to 19 appoint counsel. (ECF No. 6.) 20 Any successful application for appointment of counsel must comply with criteria set forth 21 in Bradshaw v. Zoological Society of San…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Vernon C. Weygandt v. Donald Look, Superintendent, and the Attorney General for the State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Susan B. CASTNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COLORADO SPRINGS CABLEVISION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Nancy S. Bradshaw, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Zoological Society of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981