Legal Opinion

State v. Alaniz

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 2012No. 20110259PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Christian Antonio Alaniz, Jr., appealed from an order deferring imposition of sentence entered after he conditionally-pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia. Alaniz argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because there was not probable cause to justify the search of his person and the exception to the probable cause requirement for warrantless searches by school officials did not apply. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Troy Vanyo is a police officer with the Grand Forks Police Department and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Safford Unified School District 1 v. ReddingSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Myers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. City of Dickinson v. HewsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. T. S.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
  2. State v. MeneeseWashington Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API