Legal Opinion
Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 25, 1989No. Court 89-07-00431PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DiCARLO, Judge:
Plaintiff seeks disclosure, under protective order, of certain verification exhibits submitted by a foreign producer in an ongoing antidumping investigation of new steel rail, except light rail, from Canada. This is the first case to arise under 19 U.S.C. § 1677f(c)(l), as that provision was amended by section 1332 of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, Pub.L. No. 100-418, 102 Stat. 1107, 1207-09 (1988). The amended statute provides that for antidumping investigations initiated after August 23,1988, the International Trade Administration of the United States…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- D & L Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- American Brass v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- The Brechteen Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- SNR Roulements v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- Micron Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
- Micron Technology, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Daido Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Micron Technology, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.