Legal Opinion

Cannady v. Desdin

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided October 27, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00217Unknown

1Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION ROOSEVELT CANNADY PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 3:20-cv-00217-KGB ERASMO DESDIN and DENNY SUMPTER DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is the status of this case. On July 27, 2020, plaintiff Roosevelt Cannady, proceeding pro se, filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and a complaint against his landlord, Erasmo Desdin, and Denny Sumpter, an attorney at Rogers, Coe & Sumpter (collectively, “defendants”) (Dkt. Nos. 1, 2). I. IFP Application Based on Mr. Cannady’s application to proceed IFP, Mr. Cannady…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API