Cannady v. Desdin
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION ROOSEVELT CANNADY PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 3:20-cv-00217-KGB ERASMO DESDIN and DENNY SUMPTER DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is the status of this case. On July 27, 2020, plaintiff Roosevelt Cannady, proceeding pro se, filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and a complaint against his landlord, Erasmo Desdin, and Denny Sumpter, an attorney at Rogers, Coe & Sumpter (collectively, “defendants”) (Dkt. Nos. 1, 2). I. IFP Application Based on Mr. Cannady’s application to proceed IFP, Mr. Cannady…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.