Legal Opinion

In Re Apportionment of State Legislature

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1965No. Calendar 19, Docket 50,999PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

(for remand to commission). Under the provisions of article 4, § 6, of the Constitution of 1963, petitioners filed their “petition for review” requesting that this Court: (1) review the AustinKleiner plan which, pursuant to this Court’s order, was adopted by the commission on legislative apportionment June 23, 1964, and under which plan the 1964 legislative elections were subsequently held; (2) authorize petitioners to take depositions of appropriate witnesses, including the members of the commission on legislative apportionment; (3) conduct a hearing in open court with opportunity for oral…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Fong Foo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Apportionment of State Legislature—1982Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Sincock v. GatelyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1967
  3. In Re Apportionment of State LegislatureMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Wade v. NolanAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. In Re Apportionment of State LegislatureMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API