Legal Opinion

In Re Apportionment of State Legislature

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1972No. 13 March Term 1972, Docket No. 53,919PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Kavanagh, C. J.

The people, in adopting the 1963 State Constitution, provided the procedure to carry out legislative reapportionment.1 However, for the second time in eight years the Court has had thrust upon it a proceeding which historically has been a legislative rather than a judicial one.

The activities of the political parties during the 1964 Commission on Legislative Apportionment, and the political shenanigans of both political parties making up the Commission this year, as brought out in oral argument before this Court, convinced a majority of the Court that it would be futile to remand this cause to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Swann v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Wells v. RockefellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Connor v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  2. In Re Apportionment of State Legislature—1982Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Apportionment, State Legislature-1992Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Dunnell v. AustinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1972
  5. Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API