Legal Opinion

Cameron Bros. v. Osborne

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 7, 1920No. 9760PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action by administratrix, on a contract for rental of sheep, made by defendants with her intestate. Judgment for plaintiff. Error to the District Court of Bent County, Hon. A. C. McChesney, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

The defendant in error was plaintiff below. She brought the action upon a ‘contract made by the defendants with her intestate. The verdict was for the defendants, but the court rendered a judgment for the plaintiff non obstante veredicto, for the sum of $8,479.00.

By the contract, which was dated August 31st, 1912, the defendants “rented” from D. J. Osborne, plaintiff’s intestate, 4,000 breeding ewes for five years, agreeing to pay for their use “an annual rental” in kind out of their increase: “It being understood that we will maintain said herd in a fine wooled strain of breeding during the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Ward v. Hudson River Building Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Day v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. School District No. 1 v. DauchySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
  5. Anderson v. MaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blain v. YockeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Allen v. RentfroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API