Legal Opinion
United States v. Kranz
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 7, 1949No. CR 2018cPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, District Judge.
This is a motion under the provisions of Section 2255 of Title 28 U.S.C.A. Defendant was tried and convicted in this court in 1944 of conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act of 1917, as amended. 50 U.S.C.A. § 32 [now 18 U.S.C.A. § 794]. In substance the grounds upon which the motion is based are:(1) The indictment was founded upon insufficient evidence and upon a coerced confession subsequently ruled inadmissible.(2) The matters set forth in the indictment were not within the jurisdiction (venue) of the court.(3) The allegations in the indictment are too vague and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Howell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Price v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Birtch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- United States Ex Rel. Potts v. RabbCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Yodock v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- United States v. SobellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. MontiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1951
- United States v. TheodorouDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.