Speers v. University of Akron
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GWIN, District Judge.
On December 12, 2001, Defendant University of Akron (the “University”) filed a motion for summary judgment [Doc. 45]. Plaintiff Susan Speers opposes the motion. Because material issues of fact concerning some of the plaintiffs claims need to be resolved, the Court grants in part and denies in part the University’s motion for summary judgment.
I. Summary of Arguments
Speers is a full, tenured professor in the University’s School of Dance, Theatre, and Arts Administration (“SDTAA”). In this lawsuit, Speers claims the University initiated faculty disciplinary procedures…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Roelen v. Akron Beacon JournalDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
- Serrato v. Bowling Green State UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003