Legal Opinion
Serrato v. Bowling Green State University
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 24, 2003No. 3:01-cv-07619PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
Plaintiff Violet Serrato brings this action against defendants Bowling Green State University (“BGSU”), and BGSU employees Joshua Kaplan, Marlene Reynolds, Joanne Navin, and Bryan Benner in their individual and official capacities, asserting a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for retaliation in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendment. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. This court dismissed the claims against BGSU and the four individual defendants in their official capacities. Pending is a motion for summary judgment brought ■ by Kaplan,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Petryshak v. BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005