Ransom v. Holman

SEARS, Presiding Justice.

Appellant Rayfield Ransom appeals the trial court’s decision to order an equitable partitioning of property owned by appellant and appellee Matthew Holman as tenants in common. Having reviewed the record and finding no error in the trial court’s rulings, we affirm.

Appellant filed a statutory partitioning proceeding, naming appellee and his grandfather, Grady Holman, as defendants. Appellant asserted that he owns a two-fifths interest in the subject property, and that appellee owns a three-fifths interest. Appellee responded, asserting that he owns a four-fifths…