Legal Opinion

Ransom v. Holman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 5, 2010No. A10A1376PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURN, Senior Appellate Judge.

Rayfield Ransom, acting pro se, appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his claims seeking to cancel deeds held by James and Grady Holman, which he alleges were obtained fraudulently. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand with direction.

“We review the trial court’s ruling on a motion to dismiss under the de novo standard of review.” (Punctuation omitted.) Sadi Holdings, LLC v. Lib Properties, Ltd. The record shows that in June 2002, Ransom commenced an action to partition land that he held as tenant-in-common with James…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. Rich's Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  2. Sadi Holdings, LLC v. Lib Properties, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Bhindi Bros. v. PatelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. International Telecommunications Exchange Corp. v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. Ransom v. HolmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pinnacle Benning, LLC v. Clark Realty Capital, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  2. Odion v. Avesis, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  3. McLeod v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Gege Odion v. Avesis, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API