Legal Opinion

John B. Ex Rel. L.A. v. Menke

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided December 19, 2001No. 3:98-0168PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

JOHN T. NIXON, Senior District Judge.

Part One. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Show Cause

This civil action involves the State of Tennessee’s provision of health benefits pursuant to the federal Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT) requirement. After the Plaintiffs filed their complaint on February 25, 1998 (Doc. No. 1), the parties immediately filed a Consent Decree, governing Tennessee’s duties under EPSDT. (Doc. No. 12).

Background

In 1994, the State converted its Medicaid-based fee-for-service health plan to a managed care system called…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. John B. v. GoetzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Katie A. Ex Rel. Ludin v. Los Angeles CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. John B. v. Mark EmkesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. Rosie D. v. RomneyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
  5. John B. v. GoetzDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API