In re Lagrave
New York Supreme Court
The facts will sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtEanchbr, J.
The defendant had not, as the proofs show, committed any crime for which, under the treaty between, the United States and France, he could be demanded by the one government or extradited by the other. The treaty of February 24, 1845, provides for the demand by one power and the surrender by the other of persons accused of certain crimes. One such crime is “ burglary,’’ which is defined to be the breaking and entering into a mansion-house of another, by night, with intent to commit felony. ' The crime is included, under the French law, in the words vol quaUffe crime (8 U. S. Stat. at Large, p.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ex Parte KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- United States v. CoombsSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- In re ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- Williams v. BaconNew York Supreme Court · 1834
- People v. HulbutNew York Supreme Court · 1847
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. Park, New York County Courts1915
- People v. EberspackerNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- People ex rel. Edwards v. Warden of the City PrisonNew York Supreme Court · 1902
- People ex rel. Lawton v. SnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- People ex rel. Hower v. Foote, New York County Courts1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.