Legal Opinion
Krupnick v. Union National Bank
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 1, 1979No. Civ. A. 79-44PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARSH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have filed this action alleging that defendant Harry Schreiber initiated a scheme joined by the other defendants which led to the insolvency of a group of business entities referred to as the Schreiber Enterprise. Plaintiffs allege that as a result of this scheme and the subsequent insolvency, they were unable to collect certain debts and they were deprived of certain compensation and equitable interests to which they were entitled.
It is asserted in the complaint (paragraph 8) that:
“This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to the provisions of Title 28…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Neuman v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- PAAC v. RizzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Daniel Robert Ryan v. Ohio Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Wimes v. Eaton Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1983
- Barrett v. City of AllentownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Arleamon Sadler, Jr. v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Lewis v. Charles H. Bentz Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.