Legal Opinion

Bufkin v. City of Duluth

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 4, 1980No. 50062PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTIS, Justice.

This negligence action to recover damages flowing from an injury sustained when plaintiff Mark Bufkin fell on a patch of glare ice on the sidewalk leading to the entrance of the Duluth Arena Auditorium raises the issue of whether the city and the administrative board charged with operation of the municipally owned complex were free from negligence as a matter of law. At the close of plaintiffs’ case, the trial court so held and granted defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. We have concluded that reversal is compelled because the general rule requiring a showing of more than…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carroll v. KittleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Henkes v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Adee v. EvansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Stein v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Lockway v. ProulxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doyle v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. In Re the Appointment of a Trustee for the Heirs of JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Doyle v. City of RosevilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API